RIGHT LAB
News Archive
FK 506 Tacrolimus
Primary tacrolimus (FK506) therapy and the long-term risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
Cacciarelli TV, Reyes J, Jaffe R, Mazariegos GV, Jain A, Fung JJ, Green M.
Department of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3601 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. cacciarellitv@msx.upmc.edu
While the overall incidence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in pediatric liver transplant recipients has been reported to be 4-11%, the long-term risk of PTLD associated with primary tacrolimus therapy is unknown. Therefore, in order to determine the incidence and long-term risk of PTLD, the present study examined 131 pediatric recipients who underwent liver transplantation (LTx) between October 1989 and December 1991 and received primary tacrolimus therapy. This cohort of children was evaluated over an extended time-period (until December 31 1996) with a mean follow-up of 6.3 yr. Actuarial Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to determine the risk of PTLD over time. The overall incidence of PTLD was 13% (17/131) with an average age of 4.3 +/- 0.75 yr at diagnosis. Pretransplant Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serologies were negative in 82%, positive in 12%, and not available in 6% of the patients. The median time to diagnosis of PTLD post-Tx was 11.9 months (mean 16.4 +/- 3.9, range 1.7-63.0 months). Mean tacrolimus dose and plasma trough level (as evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) at the time of diagnosis was 0.32 +/- 0.06 mg/kg/day and 1.3 +/- 0.3 ng/mL, respectively. The cumulative long-term risk of PTLD was found to increase over time: 3% at 6 months, 8% at 1 yr, 12% at 2 yr, 14% at 3 yr, and 15% at 4 and 5 yr. Mortality from PTLD was 12% (two of 17 patients). Primary tacrolimus use in pediatric LTx has a long-term risk of PTLD
Influence of tacrolimus and short-duration prednisone on bone mineral density following liver transplantation.
Scolapio JS, DeArment J, Hurley DL, Romano M, Harnois D, Weigand SD.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. scolapio.james@mayo.edu
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a known complication of chronic prednisone use. Patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) are prone to develop osteopenia and osteoporosis, and additional bone loss may occur with the use of immunosuppression agents after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT). The aim of this study was to determine the effect of tacrolimus (FK506) and short-duration (4 month) prednisone immunosuppression therapy on bone mineral density (BMD) after OLT of patients with cirrhotic ESLD. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with cirrhotic ESLD (26 men, 23 women; median age 54 years) had dual energy x-ray absorptiometry preformed at baseline and 4 and 12 months after OLT. Immunosuppression therapy after OLT included a standard transplant protocol of daily tacrolimus to maintain plasma levels between 0.2 to 0.5 ng/mL and daily oral prednisone tapered over 4 months. BMD was measured at the lumbar spine (L-BMD) and left hip (hip BMD) and reported as raw density (g/cm2) and T score (standard deviations from gender-matched young healthy subjects). Results represent total hip measurements. Two-sided paired t test and analysis of variance methods were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: Significant improvement in L-BMD was seen at 4 and 12 months. Hip BMD declined at 4 months but was stable thereafter between 4 and 12 months. BMD results did not differ between gender and liver disease types. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus and short-duration prednisone administration after OLT was not associated with bone loss at the lumbar spine at either 4 or 12 months. Significant bone loss occurred at the hip during the 4 months of prednisone administration after OLT but was stable thereafter. These findings suggest that immunosuppression protocols that use lower doses of prednisone administration over shorter time intervals may help prevent bone loss after OLT.
Impact of changing immunosuppressive monotherapy from Cyclosporin A to Tacrolimus in long-term, stable liver transplant recipients.
Ott R, Bussenius-Kammerer M, Reck T, Koch CA, Kissler H, Hohenberger W, Muller V.
Department of Surgery II, University of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany, ottr@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
A number of studies have reported a lower atherogenic lipid profile in liver transplant recipients under tacrolimus (FK506) than in those under cyclosporine A (CyA) immunosuppression. This has mainly been attributed to the steroid-saving effect of FK506. However, the effects of converting CyA to FK506 monotherapy on lipid metabolism have not been specifically investigated. In 20 patients with stable graft function, immunosuppressive monotherapy was switched from CyA to FK506 because of CyA-related side-effects (hypertension, nephrotoxicity, hypercholesterolaemia). Serum lipid levels were measured before and 3, 6 and 12 months after conversion. In 5 patients, a modification of immunosuppression became necessary during the study period (4 were reconverted to CyA, 1 to glucocorticoids). In the remaining 15 patients on FK506 monotherapy, 12 months after conversion, a slight decrease in mean serum cholesterol, a slight increase in LDL, but a significant decrease in mean serum HDL were observed, resulting in a significant increase in Chol/HDL and LDL/HDL ratios. Conversion of immunosuppressive monotherapy from CyA to FK506 had no beneficial effect on the atherogenic lipid profile in this selected study population of long-term liver transplant survivors.
Use of tacrolimus in rescue therapy of acute and chronic rejection in liver transplantation.
Coelho FF, Coelho RF, Massarollo PC, Mies S.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
PURPOSE: To study the indications and results of tacrolimus as rescue therapy for acute cellular or chronic rejection in liver transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen liver transplant recipients who underwent rescue therapy with tacrolimus between March 1995 and August 1999 were retrospectively studied. The treatment indication, patients, and graft situation were recorded as of October 31st, 1999. The response to tacrolimus was defined as patient survival with a functional graft and histological reversal of acute cellular, or for chronic rejection, bilirubin serum levels decreasing to up to twice the upper normal limit. RESULTS: Fourteen cases (77.8%) presented a good response. The response rate for the different indications was: (1) acute cellular + sepsis - 0/1 case; (2) recurrent acute cellular - 1/1 case; (3) OKT3-resistant acute cellular - 2/2 cases; (4) steroid-resistant acute cellular + active viral infection - 3/3 cases; (5) chronic rejection - 8/11 cases (72.7% response rate). The 4 patients who did not respond died. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus rescue therapy was successful in most cases of acute cellular and chronic rejection in liver transplantation.
Tacrolimus: a further update of its use in the management of organ transplantation.
Scott LJ, McKeage K, Keam SJ, Plosker GL.
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Extensive clinical use has confirmed that tacrolimus (Prograf) is a key option for immunosuppression after transplantation. In large, prospective, randomised, multicentre trials in adults and children receiving solid organ transplants, tacrolimus was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure rates and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. Notably, the lower incidence of rejection episodes after renal transplantation in tacrolimus recipients was reflected in improved cost effectiveness. In bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the incidence of tacrolimus grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease was significantly lower with tacrolimus than cyclosporin treatment. Efficacy was maintained in renal and liver transplant recipients after total withdrawal of corticosteroid therapy from tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the incidence of acute rejection episodes at up to 2 years' follow-up being similar with or without corticosteroids. Tacrolimus provided effective rescue therapy in transplant recipients with persistent acute or chronic allograft rejection or drug-related toxicity associated with cyclosporin treatment. Typically, conversion to tacrolimus reversed rejection episodes and/or improved the tolerability profile, particularly in terms of reduced hyperlipidaemia. In lung transplant recipients with obliterative bronchiolitis, conversion to tacrolimus reduced the decline in and/or improved lung function in terms of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Tolerability issues may be a factor when choosing a calcineurin inhibitor. Cyclosporin tends to be associated with a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, hirsutism, gingivitis and gum hyperplasia, whereas the incidence of some types of neurotoxicity, disturbances in glucose metabolism, diarrhoea, pruritus and alopecia may be higher with tacrolimus treatment. Renal function, as assessed by serum creatinine levels and glomerular filtration rates, was better in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients at up to 5 years' follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recent well designed trials have consolidated the place of tacrolimus as an important choice for primary immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation and in BMT. Notably, in adults and children receiving transplants, tacrolimus-based primary immunosuppression was at least as effective or provided better efficacy than cyclosporin microemulsion treatment in terms of patient and graft survival, treatment failure and the incidence of acute and corticosteroid-resistant rejection episodes. The reduced incidence of rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus translated into a better cost effectiveness relative to cyclosporin microemulsion treatment. The optimal immunosuppression regimen is ultimately dependent on balancing such factors as the efficacy of the individual drugs, their tolerability, potential for drug interactions and pharmacoeconomic issues.
Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in the management of organ transplantation.
Spencer CM, Goa KL, Gillis JC.
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Tacrolimus (FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other transplants. Extensive data have now confirmed its efficacy as primary or rescue therapy in renal and hepatic transplantation. In prospective and historically controlled studies of primary therapy, tacrolimus generally demonstrated greater efficacy than the conventional formulation of cyclosporin for preventing episodes of acute rejection and allowed reduction of corticosteroid use. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial. However, patient and graft survival rates were similar in both treatment groups (although numerically larger in adults with liver transplants). In children, rejection rates and corticosteroid requirements were usually lower with tacrolimus and patient and graft survival were generally similar with the 2 immunosuppressants. The finding of reduced corticosteroid requirements with tacrolimus may be of particular benefit in prepubertal children, who are still growing. A small amount of evidence has also accumulated regarding the use of tacrolimus as primary therapy in patients who have undergone bone marrow or heart and/or lung transplantation. Data are not conclusive, particularly in children, but tacrolimus appears to be useful for treating patients who have undergone these organ transplantations and may be associated with a lower incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis than cyclosporin in the latter group. Potential efficacy has also been shown in a limited number of patients with pancreas or pancreas-kidney, pancreatic islet and intestinal or multivisceral transplants, and in children who have undergone heart or heart-lung transplantation. Tacrolimus also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient for conclusions to be made. However, these results support the need for further study in these populations. Adverse effects occurring during tacrolimus therapy are generally of the type common to all immunosuppressive regimens. However, diabetes mellitus, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are more common in tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients. Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia are more common with cyclosporin. In 2 large multicentre clinical trials (US liver and European renal), tacrolimus was discontinued more frequently during the first year because of adverse events. However, the tolerability of tacrolimus appears related to dosage, improving as the dose is reduced. Tacrolimus should be considered an effective primary immunosuppressant in renal and hepatic transplantation. The drug is also a useful agent for rescue therapy in patients experiencing rejection or poor tolerability to cyclosporin. Thus, tacrolimus provides the clinician with an effective option for patients requiring immunosuppression and, with a different tolerability and efficacy profile to cyclosporin, it will better allow the tailoring of therapy to meet the needs of individual patients.
Tacrolimus: a further update of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in the management of organ transplantation.
Plosker GL, Foster RH.
Adis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Tacrolimus (FK-506) is an immunosuppressant agent that acts by a variety of different mechanisms which include inhibition of calcineurin. It is used as a therapeutic alternative to cyclosporin, and therefore represents a cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in organ transplant recipients. Tacrolimus is now well established for primary immunosuppression in liver and kidney transplantation, and experience with its use in other types of solid organ transplantation, including heart, lung, pancreas and intestinal, as well as its use for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), is rapidly accumulating. Large randomised nonblind multicentre studies conducted in the US and Europe in both liver and kidney transplantation showed similar patient and graft survival rates between treatment groups (although rates were numerically higher with tacrolimus- versus cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in adults with liver transplants), and a consistent statistically significant advantage for tacrolimus with respect to acute rejection rate. Chronic rejection rates were also significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver transplantation trial, and a trend towards a lower rate of chronic rejection was noted with tacrolimus in a large multicentre renal transplantation study. In general, a similar trend in overall efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of additional clinical trials comparing tacrolimus- with cyclosporin-based immunosuppression in various types of transplantation. One notable exception is in BMT, where a large randomised trial showed significantly better 2-year patient survival with cyclosporin over tacrolimus, which was primarily attributed to patients with advanced haematological malignancies at the time of (matched sibling donor) BMT. These survival results in BMT require further elucidation. Tacrolimus has also demonstrated efficacy in various types of transplantation as rescue therapy in patients who experience persistent acute rejection (or significant adverse effect's) with cyclosporin-based therapy, whereas cyclosporin has not demonstrated a similar capacity to reverse refractory acute rejection. A corticosteroid-sparing effect has been demonstrated in several studies with tacrolimus, which may be a particularly useful consideration in children receiving transplants. The differences in the tolerability profiles of tacrolimus and cyclosporin may well be an influential factor in selecting the optimal treatment for patients undergoing organ transplantation. Although both drugs have a similar degree of nephrotoxicity, cyclosporin has a higher incidence of significant hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia, while tacrolimus has a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus, some types of neurotoxicity (e.g. tremor, paraesthesia), diarrhoea and alopecia. Conclusion: Tacrolimus is an important therapeutic option for the optimal individualisation of immunosuppressive therapy in transplant recipients.
Comparison of short and long-term renal function in liver transplant patients receiving cyclosporin or FK 506.
Mor E, Patel T, Glabman S, Sheiner P, Emre S, Guy S, Schwartz M, Miller C.
Department of Surgery, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Long-term renal function was compared in 49 liver recipients [25 patients received cyclosporin (CyA) and 24 patients received FK 506] followed for a period of 1 year. Creatinine (CR) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) pretransplantation (pre-Tx) and at 1, 3, 5, and 12 months post-Tx were recorded, as well as incidences of hyperkalemia, post-Tx hypertension, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) in the two groups. At 1 year post-Tx, the mean Cr had risen from baseline by 56% and 60% in the FK and CyA groups, respectively; the mean GFR had dropped by 32% in FK patients and by 27% in CyA patients. Acute nephrotoxicity occurred in 7/25 CyA patients (2/7 required dialysis) and 9/26 FK patients (7/9 required dialysis; 2/7 were switched to CyA). None remained on dialysis at 3 months. Renal insufficiency persisted at 1 year in 7/16 patients with early toxicity (CyA, 4; FK, 3) and in 3 of the remaining 36 pts (P < 0.001). Hyperkalemia occurred in 4/25 CyA, and in 12/24 FK patients (P < 0.025), post-Tx hypertension occurred in 15 CyA, and 7 FK patients (P < 0.05), and IDDM occurred in 4 CyA and 7 FK patients (P = ns). FK 506 and CyA, thus, exerted similar chronic renal effects. Although acute renal insufficiency improved upon dose reduction, renal impairment was permanent in some cases.
Conversion from cyclosporine to FK506 in adult liver transplant recipients: a combined North American and European experience.
Selzner N, Durand F, Bernuau J, Heneghan MA, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Belghiti J, Clavien PA.
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
BACKGROUND: Although cyclosporine (CsA) made clinical liver transplantation possible, side effects and development of rejection have limited its use. In some patients, conversion to tacrolimus has been necessary to abrogate side effects and to preserve allograft function. METHODS: The results of conversion from CsA to tacrolimus were studied retrospectively in 94 liver allograft recipients from a North American and a European transplant center (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France). RESULTS: Forty-seven of 94 patients (50%) were converted for steroid-resistant acute rejection. Conversion was successful in 91% of these patients, whereas 9% of patients developed chronic rejection. A further nine patients were converted for chronic allograft rejection with positive results in eight of nine grafts. Mean serum bilirubin in these nine patients was 8.7 mg/dl before conversion and 2.1 mg/dl 6 months after conversion (P=0.02). Nine patients were converted due to inability to wean steroid. Of these, six patients remains steroid free 1 year after conversion. Twenty-three patients (24%) were converted for nephrotoxicity with a reduction in serum creatinine from 167+/-36 mmol/L to 119+/-28 mmol/L 1 year after conversion (P=0.006). Eight of 11 patients converted for neurotoxicity improved after conversion. Conversion to tacrolimus had no effect on seizure frequency or memory loss. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that conversion to tacrolimus from CsA is an appropriate paradigm for graft rescue and treatment of a variety of side effects after liver transplant. However, some situations such as memory loss and hypertension may require other strategies.